Direccion General de Ordenacion del Juego
Licence record confirmed from the Direccion General de Ordenacion del Juego register
Source: Official register
StatusActive
All casinos
Zeturf
zeturf.esDireccion General de Ordenacion del Juego licence · activeOperated by SA/NV TURF BELGIUM
Research noteThe operator's website did not answer our research request, so no outbound link is shown until the domain verifies.
Run a quick checkWhat we researched
4 of 6 confirmed- LicenceConfirmed— confirmed
- Ownership2 entities on file— confirmed
- OffersNone researched— not established
- Payments5 methods— confirmed
- ProvidersNone researched— not established
- Markets2 markets— confirmed
Last checked 5 September 2026How we check
Licence
Licence register record · register import 3 September 2026Licence record confirmed from the Belgian Gaming Commission register
Source: Official register
StatusActive
Are you the operator? Correct or update this profile
Company & legal entities
Researched relationshipsCurrent operating entities2
| Entity | Role | Ownership |
|---|---|---|
| SA/NV TURF BELGIUM | Operating company | Ownership not established |
| ZEBETTING Y GAMING ESPAÑA, SA | Operating company | Ownership not established |
Market availability
Evidence per market · one row per market| Market | Evidence | Records |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | Site listed by regulatorsportsbook: Licence holder approved for this product | 2 records |
| Spain | Site listed by regulator | 1 record |
Payments
Operator's own pages and curated review sourcesCards
Mastercard · Visa
MastercardDeposit
VisaDeposit
E-wallets
Bizum · PayPal
BizumDeposit
PayPalDeposit
Other
Paysafecard
PaysafecardDeposit
Limits are set in the operator's cashier and are not published.
Offers
Operator's own termsNo current offer research on file.
Withdrawal
Two sources, never mergedWhat the operator publishes
Nothing published
What players reported
Not enough reports yet
No moderated player reports on file yet.
Report your withdrawalWhat players report
External Reputation Signal · Trustpilot / communityExternal review signal: high concernTrustpilot 1.6/5 (77 reviews) · Very poor player score - caution
Caution: ZEturf (France) scores 1.6 out of 5 on Trustpilot (77 reviews, 78% one-star). A horse-betting brand where reviewers report withheld winnings and odds altered just before the off. Screenshot bet slips and odds at placement, verify early, withdraw promptly, and escalate to the French regulator (ANJ) with proof.
External reputation signal from third-party player reviews — not a SlotAff safety verdict, Trust score or licence assessment. Player claims are reports, not verified facts.
Common complaints
- Withheld winnings, unpaid bonuses, odds altered up to ~20s before the race (lower than picked)
- Account deactivation without explanation, extremely poor support
- 'Scam/thieves' claims vs official PMU rates
Fair points
- Minimal - overwhelmingly negative
- Recognisable French horse-betting brand
Sources: Trustpilot
Player experience
Community, moderatedNo approved reviews yet
Used Zeturf? Share how it actually went, reviews are opinion and never change a researched fact.
Common questions
Answered from held evidence onlyIs Zeturf licensed?
Yes. Zeturf holds an active Direccion General de Ordenacion del Juego licence (reference ZEBETTING Y GAMING ESPAÑA, SA), verified against the official register.
What payment methods does Zeturf accept?
Research on the operator's own pages found 5 methods, including Bizum, Visa, Mastercard, PayPal, Paysafecard.
How long do withdrawals take at Zeturf?
SlotAff has no moderated withdrawal reports for Zeturf yet. The operator's own payout claims are recorded during research but are never treated as evidence — a signed-in player can submit the first report.
How we check
Research method and coverage · last checked 5 September 2026Confirmed from a source4
- Licence status confirmed by Direccion General de Ordenacion del Juego
- Legal entity / ownership on file
- 5 payment methods documented
- Market availability researched for 2 markets
Not established2
- No offer researched, the operator's site did not answer our request
- No provider or platform data researched
A gap here is a gap in our research, not a finding about the operator. We publish a fact only when a source we can name supports it, and we say so plainly when one does not exist.