Licence record confirmed from the UK Gambling Commission register
Source: Public register entry
StatusActive
Licence record confirmed from the UK Gambling Commission register
Source: Public register entry
StatusActive
Are you the operator? Correct or update this profile
United Kingdom: Site listed by regulator The regulator publishes this exact domain in its register (domain data is operator-supplied to the regulator).
| Market | Evidence | Records |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | Site listed by regulator | 1 record |
Every method above is published for both deposits and withdrawals. Limits are set in the operator's cashier and are not published.
Published bonus terms, read from the operator's own pages or, where the label says so, from curated review pages, and structured into comparable facts. A term that is not published is not shown.
Welcome offer
Wagering, deposit minimum and cashout limits are not published in a form we could verify. Read the official terms before claiming , a headline number without its conditions is marketing, not an offer.
No Deposit Offer
10Free Spins
No longer published by the operator, kept for the record.
10 Free Spins
last seen 18 October 2026
20 Free Spins
last seen 18 October 2026
What the operator publishes
Nothing published
What players reported
Not enough reports yet
No moderated player reports on file yet.
Report your withdrawalNo approved reviews yet
Used Vegasmoose? Share how it actually went, reviews are opinion and never change a researched fact.
Yes. Vegasmoose holds an active UK Gambling Commission licence (reference 39175), verified against the official register.
Research on the operator's own pages found at least 6 methods, including Mastercard, Paysafecard, Skrill, Visa, Boku, Discover.
The most recent offer on file is "10 Free Spins". Terms are read from the operator's own offer page; always confirm them there before depositing.
SlotAff has no moderated withdrawal reports for Vegasmoose yet. The operator's own payout claims are recorded during research but are never treated as evidence — a signed-in player can submit the first report.
Confirmed from a source5
Not established1
A gap here is a gap in our research, not a finding about the operator. We publish a fact only when a source we can name supports it, and we say so plainly when one does not exist.