Welcome offer
150%+ 100 Spins
- Min deposit
- $20
- Wagering
- 50×
No official licence record linked yet. Treat this operator as unverified: we have not confirmed a licence for it against any register.
Are you the operator? Correct or update this profile
No market evidence researched yet for this operator.
Limits are set in the operator's cashier and are not published.
Published bonus terms, read from the operator's own pages or, where the label says so, from curated review pages, and structured into comparable facts. A term that is not published is not shown.
Welcome offer
What the operator publishes
Nothing published
What players reported
Not enough reports yet
No moderated player reports on file yet.
Report your withdrawalExternal review signal: high concernTrustpilot 1.6/5 (204 reviews) · Very poor player score - caution
Caution: Vave scores 1.6 out of 5 on Trustpilot (204 reviews, 62% one-star). A TechOptions/Ivibet-network crypto brand where deposits go missing despite blockchain confirmation and withdrawals are blocked on shifting reasons, with its former Curacao licence reportedly terminated. Verify early, screenshot tx hashes, keep deposits small, and withdraw promptly - crypto means no chargeback.
External reputation signal from third-party player reviews — not a SlotAff safety verdict, Trust score or licence assessment. Player claims are reports, not verified facts.
Sources: Trustpilot
No approved reviews yet
Used Vave? Share how it actually went, reviews are opinion and never change a researched fact.
No licence is on record for Vave in the registers SlotAff tracks. That is not proof it is unlicensed, but no register we ingest lists it.
Research on the operator's own pages found at least 6 methods, including Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin, Tether, Bitcoin Cash, USDT.
The most recent offer on file is "150% + 100 Spins". Terms are read from the operator's own offer page; always confirm them there before depositing.
SlotAff has no moderated withdrawal reports for Vave yet. The operator's own payout claims are recorded during research but are never treated as evidence — a signed-in player can submit the first report.
Confirmed from a source3
Not established3
A gap here is a gap in our research, not a finding about the operator. We publish a fact only when a source we can name supports it, and we say so plainly when one does not exist.