Licence record confirmed from the UK Gambling Commission register
Source: Public register entry
StatusActive
UKGC licence · activeOperated by 4C Games Ltd
Run a quick check
Licence record confirmed from the UK Gambling Commission register
Source: Public register entry
StatusActive
Are you the operator? Correct or update this profile
| Entity | Role | Ownership |
|---|---|---|
| 4C Games Ltd | Operating company | Ownership not established |
United Kingdom: Site listed by regulator The regulator publishes this exact domain in its register (domain data is operator-supplied to the regulator).
| Market | Evidence | Records |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | Site listed by regulator | 1 record |
No payment method research on file.
No current offer research on file.
What the operator publishes
Nothing published
What players reported
Not enough reports yet
No moderated player reports on file yet.
Report your withdrawalExternal review signal: high concernTrustpilot 2/5 (31 reviews) · Poor player score - caution
Caution: SportsBroker scores 2.0 out of 5 on Trustpilot (31 reviews). The novel sports-trading concept is undermined by reports of accounts banned after winning and odds far below industry standard. Screenshot displayed odds and bets, keep stakes small, withdraw promptly, and be aware winning players report selective bans.
External reputation signal from third-party player reviews — not a SlotAff safety verdict, Trust score or licence assessment. Player claims are reports, not verified facts.
Sources: Trustpilot
No approved reviews yet
Used Sportsbroker? Share how it actually went, reviews are opinion and never change a researched fact.
Yes. Sportsbroker holds an active UK Gambling Commission licence (reference 062840-R-337939-003), verified against the official register.
SlotAff has no moderated withdrawal reports for Sportsbroker yet. The operator's own payout claims are recorded during research but are never treated as evidence — a signed-in player can submit the first report.
Confirmed from a source3
Not established3
A gap here is a gap in our research, not a finding about the operator. We publish a fact only when a source we can name supports it, and we say so plainly when one does not exist.