Gemeinsame Glücksspielbehörde der Länder
Licence record confirmed from the Gemeinsame Glücksspielbehörde der Länder register
Source: Official register
StatusActive
Gemeinsame Glücksspielbehörde der Länder licence · activeOperated by Rootz Limited
Research noteThe operator's website did not answer our research request, so no outbound link is shown until the domain verifies.
Run a quick checkGemeinsame Glücksspielbehörde der Länder
Licence record confirmed from the Gemeinsame Glücksspielbehörde der Länder register
Source: Official register
StatusActive
Are you the operator? Correct or update this profile
| Entity | Role | Ownership |
|---|---|---|
| Rootz Limited | Operating company | Ownership not established |
| Market | Evidence | Records |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | Site listed by regulatorslots: Regulator-listed site(s) confirmed | 2 records |
Limits are set in the operator's cashier and are not published.
Published bonus terms, read from the operator's own pages or, where the label says so, from curated review pages, and structured into comparable facts. A term that is not published is not shown.
Welcome offer
What the operator publishes
Nothing published
What players reported
Not enough reports yet
No moderated player reports on file yet.
Report your withdrawalNo approved reviews yet
Used Spinz? Share how it actually went, reviews are opinion and never change a researched fact.
Yes. Spinz holds an active Gemeinsame Glücksspielbehörde der Länder licence (reference Rootz Limited), verified against the official register.
Research on the operator's own pages found at least 6 methods, including Visa, Mastercard, Skrill, Neteller, Trustly, Paysafecard.
The most recent offer on file is "100% up to €500 + 200 Free Spins". Terms are read from the operator's own offer page; always confirm them there before depositing.
SlotAff has no moderated withdrawal reports for Spinz yet. The operator's own payout claims are recorded during research but are never treated as evidence — a signed-in player can submit the first report.
Confirmed from a source6
Not established0
A gap here is a gap in our research, not a finding about the operator. We publish a fact only when a source we can name supports it, and we say so plainly when one does not exist.