Skip to content

Licence

Licence register record · register import 15 October 2026

Curacao Gaming Authority

Listed for this operator by a review source; the Curacao Gaming Authority register does not confirm it

Source: Official register

StatusDeclared, not confirmed

Reference
Not recorded
Jurisdiction
Not recorded
Last checked
15 October 2026

Evidence

Licence record

Are you the operator? Correct or update this profile

Market availability

Evidence per market · one row per market

No market evidence researched yet for this operator.

Payments

Operator's own pages and curated review sources

Cards

Mastercard · Visa
MastercardDeposit
VisaDeposit

Crypto

Bitcoin · Bitcoin Cash · Ethereum +4
BitcoinDeposit
Bitcoin CashDeposit · Withdrawal
EthereumDeposit
LitecoinDeposit · Withdrawal
RippleDeposit · Withdrawal
TetherDeposit
USDTDeposit · Withdrawal

E-wallets

MuchBetter · Neteller · Skrill
MuchBetterDeposit · Withdrawal
NetellerDeposit · Withdrawal
SkrillDeposit · Withdrawal

Bank and open banking

Interac
InteracDeposit · Withdrawal

Other

Neosurf · Paysafecard
NeosurfDeposit
PaysafecardDeposit · Withdrawal

Limits are set in the operator's cashier and are not published.

Offers

Operator's own terms

No current offer research on file.

Providers

Researched · unverified generic data hidden

Game studios

Hacksaw Gaming

Withdrawal

Two sources, never merged

What the operator publishes

Nothing published

What players reported

Not enough reports yet

No moderated player reports on file yet.

Report your withdrawal

Third-party reputation

Independent aggregators
  • AskGamblersAggregator rating6.6/10source · as of 10 October 2026
  • LCB.orgCommunity sentiment2.7/5 from LCB members; 83% said "OK"source · as of 14 October 2026
  • LCB.orgAggregator rating2.7/5 (LCB review)source · as of 14 October 2026

What players report

External Reputation Signal · Trustpilot / community

External review signal: high concernTrustpilot 3.5/5 (553 reviews) · Mixed score — caution

Caution: SpinBet scores 3.5 out of 5 on Trustpilot (553 reviews). Many are paid quickly, but the serious threads are bonus winnings that can't be withdrawn, permanent account restrictions (sometimes right after contacting support), and a reported NZ$5,800 confiscation. Skip the bonus if you want cash play, verify early, keep records, and withdraw promptly rather than trusting the VIP treatment.

External reputation signal from third-party player reviews — not a SlotAff safety verdict, Trust score or licence assessment. Player claims are reports, not verified facts.

Common complaints

  • Withdrawals declined or delayed 15+ days; permanent account restrictions without clear reason
  • Bonus winnings can't be withdrawn ('if you win using bonus you cannot withdraw anything')
  • Slow support (6h+ chat) and restrictions imposed right after contacting support
  • Reports of stolen winnings (NZ$5,800 cited)

Fair points

  • Fast payouts when functioning normally
  • Attentive VIP support that makes players 'feel like you matter'

Sources: Trustpilot

Player experience

Community, moderated

No approved reviews yet

Used SpinBet? Share how it actually went, reviews are opinion and never change a researched fact.

Write a review

Common questions

Answered from held evidence only
Is SpinBet licensed?

SpinBet has a Curacao Gaming Authority record on file, but its current status is unconfirmed in SlotAff's register checks.

What payment methods does SpinBet accept?

Research on the operator's own pages found at least 6 methods, including Visa, Mastercard, Bitcoin, Ethereum, Tether, Neosurf.

How long do withdrawals take at SpinBet?

SlotAff has no moderated withdrawal reports for SpinBet yet. The operator's own payout claims are recorded during research but are never treated as evidence — a signed-in player can submit the first report.

How we check

Research method and coverage · last checked 15 October 2026

Confirmed from a source2

  • 15 payment methods documented
  • Game/platform providers identified

Not established4

  • Licence status not confirmed from an authoritative source
  • No legal entity or ownership record identified
  • No current offer researched
  • No market availability confirmed

A gap here is a gap in our research, not a finding about the operator. We publish a fact only when a source we can name supports it, and we say so plainly when one does not exist.