Licence record confirmed from the Spelinspektionen register
Source: Official register
StatusActive
Spelinspektionen licence · activeOperated by SverigeCasino Limited
Run a quick checkLicence record confirmed from the Spelinspektionen register
Source: Official register
StatusActive
Are you the operator? Correct or update this profile
| Entity | Role | Ownership |
|---|---|---|
| SverigeCasino Limited | Operating company | Ownership not established |
| Market | Evidence | Records |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | Site listed by regulatorcasino: Licence holder approved for this productsportsbook: Licence holder approved for this product | 3 records |
Limits are set in the operator's cashier and are not published.
No current offer research on file.
What the operator publishes
Nothing published
What players reported
Not enough reports yet
No moderated player reports on file yet.
Report your withdrawalExternal review signal: high concernTrustpilot 1.8/5 (35 reviews) · Poor player score - caution
Caution: Spelklubben (Sweden) scores 1.8 out of 5 on Trustpilot (35 reviews, 83% one-star). The pattern is blocked withdrawals and accounts frozen despite full KYC. Verify early, keep wins modest, withdraw promptly, and escalate a frozen legitimate payout to the Swedish regulator (Spelinspektionen).
External reputation signal from third-party player reviews — not a SlotAff safety verdict, Trust score or licence assessment. Player claims are reports, not verified facts.
Sources: Trustpilot
No approved reviews yet
Used Spelklubben? Share how it actually went, reviews are opinion and never change a researched fact.
Yes. Spelklubben holds an active Spelinspektionen licence (reference SverigeCasino Limited), verified against the official register.
Research on the operator's own pages found 5 methods, including Swish, Trustly, Visa, Mastercard, Neteller.
SlotAff has no moderated withdrawal reports for Spelklubben yet. The operator's own payout claims are recorded during research but are never treated as evidence — a signed-in player can submit the first report.
Confirmed from a source4
Not established2
A gap here is a gap in our research, not a finding about the operator. We publish a fact only when a source we can name supports it, and we say so plainly when one does not exist.