Licence record confirmed from the Spelinspektionen register
Source: Official register
StatusActive
All casinos
Prontocasino
prontocasino.comSpelinspektionen licence · activeOperated by Premiergaming LtdSafety Index 8.3/10 (High) · Casino Guru
Run a quick checkWhat we researched
5 of 6 confirmed- LicenceConfirmed— confirmed
- Ownership1 entity on file— confirmed
- OffersNone researched— not established
- Payments6 methods— confirmed
- Providers1 provider— confirmed
- Markets1 market— confirmed
Last checked 15 October 2026How we check
Licence
Licence register record · register import 15 October 2026Listed for this operator by a review source; the Malta Gaming Authority register does not confirm it
Source: Official register
StatusDeclared, not confirmed
Are you the operator? Correct or update this profile
Company & legal entities
Researched relationshipsCurrent operating entities1
| Entity | Role | Ownership |
|---|---|---|
| Premiergaming Ltd | Operating company | Ownership not established |
Market availability
Evidence per market · one row per market| Market | Evidence | Records |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | Licence holder confirmedcasino: Licence holder approved for this productsportsbook: Licence holder approved for this product | 3 records |
Payments
Operator's own pages and curated review sourcesCards
Mastercard · Visa
MastercardDeposit
VisaDeposit
Crypto
Bitcoin
BitcoinDeposit
E-wallets
Neteller · Skrill
NetellerDeposit
SkrillDeposit
Bank and open banking
Trustly
TrustlyDeposit · Withdrawal
Limits are set in the operator's cashier and are not published.
Offers
Operator's own termsNo current offer research on file.
Providers
Researched · unverified generic data hiddenGame studios
NetEnt
Withdrawal
Two sources, never mergedWhat the operator publishes
Nothing published
What players reported
Not enough reports yet
No moderated player reports on file yet.
Report your withdrawalThird-party reputation
Independent aggregators- casino_guruSafety Index8.3/10 (High)
- AskGamblersAggregator rating7.2/10
What players report
External Reputation Signal · Trustpilot / communityExternal review signal: high concernTrustpilot 1.9/5 (12 reviews) · Very poor player score, small sample - caution
Caution: Pronto Casino scores 1.9 out of 5 on Trustpilot (small sample of 12 reviews, 92% one-star). The reports are refused payouts and delay-to-cancel tactics. Small sample: verify early, keep deposits and wins modest, withdraw promptly, and escalate a refused legitimate payout to the licensing regulator.
External reputation signal from third-party player reviews — not a SlotAff safety verdict, Trust score or licence assessment. Player claims are reports, not verified facts.
Common complaints
- Refuses to pay out winnings 'no matter how small'
- 5-day withdrawal delays designed to trigger cancellation
- Accounts blocked during withdrawal despite prior verification
Fair points
- Minimal - 0% four/five-star
Sources: Trustpilot
Player experience
Community, moderatedNo approved reviews yet
Used Prontocasino? Share how it actually went, reviews are opinion and never change a researched fact.
Common questions
Answered from held evidence onlyIs Prontocasino licensed?
Yes. Prontocasino holds an active Spelinspektionen licence (reference Premiergaming Ltd), verified against the official register.
What payment methods does Prontocasino accept?
Research on the operator's own pages found at least 6 methods, including Visa, Mastercard, Skrill, Neteller, Bitcoin, Trustly.
How long do withdrawals take at Prontocasino?
SlotAff has no moderated withdrawal reports for Prontocasino yet. The operator's own payout claims are recorded during research but are never treated as evidence — a signed-in player can submit the first report.
How we check
Research method and coverage · last checked 15 October 2026Confirmed from a source5
- Licence status confirmed by Spelinspektionen
- Legal entity / ownership on file
- 6 payment methods documented
- Game/platform providers identified
- Market availability researched for 1 market
Not established1
- No current offer researched
A gap here is a gap in our research, not a finding about the operator. We publish a fact only when a source we can name supports it, and we say so plainly when one does not exist.