Licence record confirmed from the Spelinspektionen register
Source: Official register
StatusActive
Spelinspektionen licence · activeOperated by Roi Roger LimitedSafety Index 8.5/10 (High) · Casino Guru
Run a quick checkLicence record confirmed from the Spelinspektionen register
Source: Official register
StatusActive
Are you the operator? Correct or update this profile
| Entity | Role | Ownership |
|---|---|---|
| Roi Roger Limited | Operating company | Ownership not established |
| Market | Evidence | Records |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | Site listed by regulatorcasino: Licence holder approved for this product | 2 records |
Limits are set in the operator's cashier and are not published.
No current offer research on file.
What the operator publishes
Nothing published
What players reported
Not enough reports yet
No moderated player reports on file yet.
Report your withdrawalExternal review signal: medium concernTrustpilot 3.3/5 (19 reviews) · Mixed, small sample; Swedish-licensed
Mixed: Pop Casino (Sweden) scores 3.3 out of 5 on Trustpilot (small sample of 19 reviews, 53% one-star). A Spelinspektionen-licensed newcomer with rigged-feel gripes but no confiscation pattern. Small sample: verify early, keep wins modest, and withdraw promptly.
External reputation signal from third-party player reviews — not a SlotAff safety verdict, Trust score or licence assessment. Player claims are reports, not verified facts.
Sources: Trustpilot
No approved reviews yet
Used Popcasino? Share how it actually went, reviews are opinion and never change a researched fact.
Yes. Popcasino holds an active Spelinspektionen licence (reference Roi Roger Limited), verified against the official register.
Research on the operator's own pages found 5 methods, including Swish, Trustly, Visa, Mastercard, Neteller.
SlotAff has no moderated withdrawal reports for Popcasino yet. The operator's own payout claims are recorded during research but are never treated as evidence — a signed-in player can submit the first report.
Confirmed from a source5
Not established1
A gap here is a gap in our research, not a finding about the operator. We publish a fact only when a source we can name supports it, and we say so plainly when one does not exist.