Licence record confirmed from the Spelinspektionen register
Source: Official register
StatusActive
Spelinspektionen licence · activeOperated by Enlabs Nordics OÜSafety Index 8.5/10 (High) · Casino Guru
Run a quick checkLicence record confirmed from the Spelinspektionen register
Source: Official register
StatusActive
Are you the operator? Correct or update this profile
| Entity | Role | Ownership |
|---|---|---|
| Enlabs Nordics OÜ | Operating company | Ownership not established |
| Market | Evidence | Records |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | Licence holder confirmedcasino: Licence holder approved for this productsportsbook: Licence holder approved for this product | 3 records |
Limits are set in the operator's cashier and are not published.
Published bonus terms, read from the operator's own pages or, where the label says so, from curated review pages, and structured into comparable facts. A term that is not published is not shown.
Welcome offer
Wagering, deposit minimum and cashout limits are not published in a form we could verify. Read the official terms before claiming , a headline number without its conditions is marketing, not an offer.
What the operator publishes
Nothing published
What players reported
Not enough reports yet
No moderated player reports on file yet.
Report your withdrawalNo approved reviews yet
Used Nanocasino? Share how it actually went, reviews are opinion and never change a researched fact.
Yes. Nanocasino holds an active Spelinspektionen licence (reference Enlabs Nordics OÜ), verified against the official register.
Research on the operator's own pages found 3 methods, including Trustly, Swish, Zimpler.
The most recent offer on file is "100% up to 3000 SEK + 100 Free Spins". Terms are read from the operator's own offer page; always confirm them there before depositing.
SlotAff has no moderated withdrawal reports for Nanocasino yet. The operator's own payout claims are recorded during research but are never treated as evidence — a signed-in player can submit the first report.
Confirmed from a source5
Not established1
A gap here is a gap in our research, not a finding about the operator. We publish a fact only when a source we can name supports it, and we say so plainly when one does not exist.