Servico de Regulacao e Inspecao de Jogos
Licence record confirmed from the Servico de Regulacao e Inspecao de Jogos register
Source: Official register
StatusActive
Servico de Regulacao e Inspecao de Jogos licence · activeOperated by CARAVEL ENTERTAINMENT LIMITED
Research noteThe operator's website did not answer our research request, so no outbound link is shown until the domain verifies.
Run a quick checkServico de Regulacao e Inspecao de Jogos
Licence record confirmed from the Servico de Regulacao e Inspecao de Jogos register
Source: Official register
StatusActive
Are you the operator? Correct or update this profile
| Entity | Role | Ownership |
|---|---|---|
| CARAVEL ENTERTAINMENT LIMITED | Operating company | Ownership not established |
| Market | Evidence | Records |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | Site listed by regulator | 1 record |
Limits are set in the operator's cashier and are not published.
Published bonus terms, read from the operator's own pages or, where the label says so, from curated review pages, and structured into comparable facts. A term that is not published is not shown.
Welcome offer
What the operator publishes
Nothing published
What players reported
Not enough reports yet
No moderated player reports on file yet.
Report your withdrawalNo approved reviews yet
Used Moosh? Share how it actually went, reviews are opinion and never change a researched fact.
Yes. Moosh holds an active Servico de Regulacao e Inspecao de Jogos licence (reference CARAVEL ENTERTAINMENT LIMITED), verified against the official register.
Research on the operator's own pages found 4 methods, including Visa, Mastercard, American Express, Multibanco.
The most recent offer on file is "100% up to €100". Terms are read from the operator's own offer page; always confirm them there before depositing.
SlotAff has no moderated withdrawal reports for Moosh yet. The operator's own payout claims are recorded during research but are never treated as evidence — a signed-in player can submit the first report.
Confirmed from a source5
Not established1
A gap here is a gap in our research, not a finding about the operator. We publish a fact only when a source we can name supports it, and we say so plainly when one does not exist.