Skip to content
All casinos

Luckymate

luckymate.co.uk

UKGC licence · activeOperated by Anakatech Interactive LimitedSafety Index 8.7/10 · Casino Guru

Run a quick check
Luckymate homepage
Homepage, captured 30 August 2026

What we researched

4 of 6 confirmed
Last checked 15 October 2026How we check

Licence

Licence register record · register import 7 September 2026

UK Gambling Commission

Licence record confirmed from the UK Gambling Commission register

Source: Public register entry

StatusActive

Reference
048789-R-327402-013
Jurisdiction
Not recorded
Last checked
7 September 2026

Evidence

Licence record

Are you the operator? Correct or update this profile

Company & legal entities

Researched relationships
Current operating entities1
EntityRoleOwnership
Anakatech Interactive LimitedOperating companyOwnership not established

Market availability

Evidence per market · one row per market

United Kingdom: Site listed by regulator The regulator publishes this exact domain in its register (domain data is operator-supplied to the regulator).

MarketEvidenceRecords
United KingdomSite listed by regulatorcasino: Licence holder approved for this productsportsbook: Licence holder approved for this product3 records

Payments

Operator's own pages and curated review sources

No payment method research on file.

Offers

Operator's own terms

No current offer research on file.

Providers

Researched · unverified generic data hidden

Live dealer

Ezugi
Pragmatic Play Live
Playtech Live
Evolution

Game studios

Playtech
Big Time Gaming
NetEnt
Wazdan
Play'n GO
Relax Gaming
Red Tiger
ELK Studios
Pragmatic Play

Withdrawal

Two sources, never merged

What the operator publishes

Nothing published

What players reported

Not enough reports yet

No moderated player reports on file yet.

Report your withdrawal

Third-party reputation

Independent aggregators
  • AskGamblersAggregator rating6.8/10source · as of 9 October 2026
  • casino_guruSafety Index8.7 out of 10source · as of 15 October 2026

What players report

External Reputation Signal · Trustpilot / community

External review signal: high concernTrustpilot 2/5 (144 reviews) · Poor player score - caution

Caution: Luckymate scores 2.0 out of 5 on Trustpilot (144 reviews, 74% one-star). Some are paid within a day, but the serious reports are winnings withheld entirely (one £1,509 unpaid). Verify early, keep deposits small, withdraw promptly, and use IBAS/UKGC recourse if a legitimate win goes unpaid.

External reputation signal from third-party player reviews — not a SlotAff safety verdict, Trust score or licence assessment. Player claims are reports, not verified facts.

Common complaints

  • Winnings unpaid - one 'deposited £200, won £1,509, still not received a penny'
  • Poor RTP with excessive dead spins
  • Confusing wagering that needs deposits to exceed bonus value first
  • 74% one-star; generic replies then unresolved follow-ups

Fair points

  • Fast payouts within hours-to-24h when processed
  • 50 free-spin welcome delivered for some

Sources: Trustpilot

Player experience

Community, moderated

No approved reviews yet

Used Luckymate? Share how it actually went, reviews are opinion and never change a researched fact.

Write a review

Common questions

Answered from held evidence only
Is Luckymate licensed?

Yes. Luckymate holds an active UK Gambling Commission licence (reference 048789-R-327402-013), verified against the official register.

How long do withdrawals take at Luckymate?

SlotAff has no moderated withdrawal reports for Luckymate yet. The operator's own payout claims are recorded during research but are never treated as evidence — a signed-in player can submit the first report.

How we check

Research method and coverage · last checked 15 October 2026

Confirmed from a source4

  • Licence status confirmed by UK Gambling Commission
  • Legal entity / ownership on file
  • Game/platform providers identified
  • Market availability researched for 1 market

Not established2

  • No current offer researched
  • No payment methods on file

A gap here is a gap in our research, not a finding about the operator. We publish a fact only when a source we can name supports it, and we say so plainly when one does not exist.