Licence record confirmed from the Belgian Gaming Commission register
Source: Official register
StatusActive
All casinos
Goldenpalacedice
goldenpalacedice.beBelgian Gaming Commission licence · activeOperated by SA/NV GOLDEN PALACE WATERLOOSafety Index 7.9/10 (Above average, Golden Palace BE) · Casino Guru
Run a quick checkWhat we researched
5 of 6 confirmed- LicenceConfirmed— confirmed
- Ownership1 entity on file— confirmed
- OffersNone researched— not established
- Payments7 methods— confirmed
- Providers3 providers— confirmed
- Markets1 market— confirmed
Last checked 25 September 2026How we check
Licence
Licence register record · register import 3 September 2026Are you the operator? Correct or update this profile
Company & legal entities
Researched relationshipsCurrent operating entities1
| Entity | Role | Ownership |
|---|---|---|
| SA/NV GOLDEN PALACE WATERLOO | Operating company | Ownership not established |
Market availability
Evidence per market · one row per market| Market | Evidence | Records |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | Site listed by regulatorclass ii online games: Site listed by regulator for this product | 2 records |
Payments
Operator's own pages and curated review sourcesCards
Mastercard · Visa
MastercardDeposit
VisaDeposit
E-wallets
Neteller · PayPal · Skrill
NetellerDeposit
PayPalDeposit
SkrillDeposit
Bank and open banking
Bancontact
BancontactDeposit
Other
Paysafecard
PaysafecardDeposit
Limits are set in the operator's cashier and are not published.
Offers
Operator's own termsNo current offer research on file.
Providers
Researched · unverified generic data hiddenLive dealer
Ezugi
Game studios
Pragmatic Play
Betsoft
Withdrawal
Two sources, never mergedWhat the operator publishes
Nothing published
What players reported
Not enough reports yet
No moderated player reports on file yet.
Report your withdrawalThird-party reputation
Independent aggregators- casino_guruSafety Index7.9/10 (Above average, Golden Palace BE)
What players report
External Reputation Signal · Trustpilot / communityExternal review signal: medium concernTrustpilot 3.7/5 (416 reviews) · Mixed; Belgian-licensed
Mixed: Golden Palace (Belgium) scores 3.7 out of 5 on Trustpilot (416 reviews, 33% one-star). A Belgian-licensed brand that's decent overall but with a thread of post-win verification and slow bank-transfer payouts. Verify early so a win doesn't trigger fresh checks, keep records, and withdraw promptly.
External reputation signal from third-party player reviews — not a SlotAff safety verdict, Trust score or licence assessment. Player claims are reports, not verified facts.
Common complaints
- Payouts stuck in processing for weeks; emails unanswered
- Extra document requests only AFTER depositing and winning
- Slow 2-5 day bank-transfer withdrawals, low win-rate gripes
Fair points
- Very good odds, enjoyable gameplay
- Wide sports and casino selection
Sources: Trustpilot
Player experience
Community, moderatedNo approved reviews yet
Used Goldenpalacedice? Share how it actually went, reviews are opinion and never change a researched fact.
Common questions
Answered from held evidence onlyIs Goldenpalacedice licensed?
Yes. Goldenpalacedice holds an active Belgian Gaming Commission licence (reference 3767), verified against the official register.
What payment methods does Goldenpalacedice accept?
Research on the operator's own pages found at least 6 methods, including Bancontact, Visa, Mastercard, PayPal, Skrill, Neteller.
How long do withdrawals take at Goldenpalacedice?
SlotAff has no moderated withdrawal reports for Goldenpalacedice yet. The operator's own payout claims are recorded during research but are never treated as evidence — a signed-in player can submit the first report.
How we check
Research method and coverage · last checked 25 September 2026Confirmed from a source5
- Licence status confirmed by Belgian Gaming Commission
- Legal entity / ownership on file
- 7 payment methods documented
- Game/platform providers identified
- Market availability researched for 1 market
Not established1
- No current offer researched
A gap here is a gap in our research, not a finding about the operator. We publish a fact only when a source we can name supports it, and we say so plainly when one does not exist.