Skip to content
All casinos

Fafabet

fafabet.co.uk

UKGC licence · activeOperated by Taichi Tech Limited

Research noteThe operator's website did not answer our research request, so no outbound link is shown until the domain verifies.

Run a quick check

What we researched

4 of 6 confirmed
Last checked 7 September 2026How we check

Licence

Licence register record · register import 7 September 2026

UK Gambling Commission

Licence record confirmed from the UK Gambling Commission register

Source: Public register entry

StatusActive

Reference
057385-R-333191-006
Jurisdiction
Not recorded
Last checked
7 September 2026

Evidence

Licence record

Are you the operator? Correct or update this profile

Company & legal entities

Researched relationships
Current operating entities1
EntityRoleOwnership
Taichi Tech LimitedOperating companyOwnership not established

Market availability

Evidence per market · one row per market

United Kingdom: Site listed by regulator The regulator publishes this exact domain in its register (domain data is operator-supplied to the regulator).

MarketEvidenceRecords
United KingdomSite listed by regulatorcasino: Licence holder approved for this productsportsbook: Licence holder approved for this product3 records

Payments

Operator's own pages and curated review sources

Cards

Mastercard · Visa
MastercardDeposit
VisaDeposit

Bank and open banking

Bank Transfer
Bank TransferDeposit

Other

Paysafecard
PaysafecardDeposit

Limits are set in the operator's cashier and are not published.

Offers

Operator's own terms

No current offer research on file.

Withdrawal

Two sources, never merged

What the operator publishes

Nothing published

What players reported

Not enough reports yet

No moderated player reports on file yet.

Report your withdrawal

What players report

External Reputation Signal · Trustpilot / community

External review signal: high concernTrustpilot 1.5/5 (410 reviews) · Very poor player score - caution

Caution: Fafabet scores 1.5 out of 5 on Trustpilot (410 reviews, 71% one-star). A textbook winner-penalty pattern: accounts suspended after wins and winnings voided under disputed bonus terms (one GBP3.5k win wiped). Read wagering terms before opting into any bonus, verify early, keep wins modest, and escalate a voided legitimate payout to the UKGC/IBAS.

External reputation signal from third-party player reviews — not a SlotAff safety verdict, Trust score or licence assessment. Player claims are reports, not verified facts.

Common complaints

  • Accounts suspended right after wins (one says hit 25x on slots = suspended)
  • Intrusive KYC interrogation (bank statements, payslip, licence) to withdraw
  • Winnings voided under disputed bonus/wagering terms - one won GBP3.5k on GBP500, all voided
  • Payouts blocked

Fair points

  • Occasionally helpful support
  • Straightforward deposits, quick initial verification

Sources: Trustpilot

Player experience

Community, moderated

No approved reviews yet

Used Fafabet? Share how it actually went, reviews are opinion and never change a researched fact.

Write a review

Common questions

Answered from held evidence only
Is Fafabet licensed?

Yes. Fafabet holds an active UK Gambling Commission licence (reference 057385-R-333191-006), verified against the official register.

What payment methods does Fafabet accept?

Research on the operator's own pages found 4 methods, including Visa, Mastercard, Paysafecard, Bank Transfer.

How long do withdrawals take at Fafabet?

SlotAff has no moderated withdrawal reports for Fafabet yet. The operator's own payout claims are recorded during research but are never treated as evidence — a signed-in player can submit the first report.

How we check

Research method and coverage · last checked 7 September 2026

Confirmed from a source4

  • Licence status confirmed by UK Gambling Commission
  • Legal entity / ownership on file
  • 4 payment methods documented
  • Market availability researched for 1 market

Not established2

  • No offer researched, the operator's site did not answer our request
  • No provider or platform data researched

A gap here is a gap in our research, not a finding about the operator. We publish a fact only when a source we can name supports it, and we say so plainly when one does not exist.