Direccion General de Ordenacion del Juego
Licence record confirmed from the Direccion General de Ordenacion del Juego register
Source: Official register
StatusActive
All casinos
Dafabet
dafabet.esDireccion General de Ordenacion del Juego licence · activeOperated by EURASIA SOLUTIONS, PLC
Run a quick checkWhat we researched
4 of 6 confirmed- LicenceConfirmed— confirmed
- Ownership1 entity on file— confirmed
- OffersNone researched— not established
- Payments6 methods— confirmed
- ProvidersNone researched— not established
- Markets1 market— confirmed
Last checked 18 October 2026How we check
Licence
Licence register record · register import 3 September 2026Are you the operator? Correct or update this profile
Company & legal entities
Researched relationshipsCurrent operating entities1
| Entity | Role | Ownership |
|---|---|---|
| EURASIA SOLUTIONS, PLC | Operating company | Ownership not established |
Market availability
Evidence per market · one row per market| Market | Evidence | Records |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | Site listed by regulator | 1 record |
Payments
Operator's own pages and curated review sourcesCards
Mastercard · Visa
MastercardDeposit
VisaDeposit
Crypto
Bitcoin
BitcoinDeposit · Withdrawal
E-wallets
Bizum · PayPal
BizumDeposit
PayPalDeposit
Other
Paysafecard
PaysafecardDeposit
Limits are set in the operator's cashier and are not published.
Offers
Operator's own termsNo current offer research on file.
Withdrawal
Two sources, never mergedWhat the operator publishes
Nothing published
What players reported
Not enough reports yet
No moderated player reports on file yet.
Report your withdrawalThird-party reputation
Independent aggregators- casinoreviewsStrengths (aggregator)Experienced Operator; Variety of Bonuses and Offers; 4 Dedicated Mobile Apps
- casinoreviewsWeaknesses (aggregator)Few Jackpot Slots; No Phone Support
What players report
External Reputation Signal · Trustpilot / communityExternal review signal: high concernTrustpilot 1.1/5 (814 reviews) · Very poor player score - caution
Caution: Dafabet scores 1.1 out of 5 on Trustpilot (814 reviews, 93% one-star). A large Asia-facing brand where the dominant reports are deposits not credited and withdrawals stalled for months-to-years with winnings confiscated on disputes. Screenshot every deposit, verify early, keep balances small, withdraw promptly, and pursue a chargeback via your payment provider if a deposit vanishes.
External reputation signal from third-party player reviews — not a SlotAff safety verdict, Trust score or licence assessment. Player claims are reports, not verified facts.
Common complaints
- Deposits debited but never credited (one Rs.50,000 uncredited)
- Withdrawals pending months to years - one unpaid after 8 months
- Accounts blocked without notice, funds inaccessible
- Legitimate winnings confiscated on alleged verification/bonus disputes
Fair points
- Minimal - 93% one-star
- Long-time users cite history but ongoing issues
Sources: Trustpilot
Player experience
Community, moderatedNo approved reviews yet
Used Dafabet? Share how it actually went, reviews are opinion and never change a researched fact.
Common questions
Answered from held evidence onlyIs Dafabet licensed?
Yes. Dafabet holds an active Direccion General de Ordenacion del Juego licence (reference EURASIA SOLUTIONS, PLC), verified against the official register.
What payment methods does Dafabet accept?
Research on the operator's own pages found at least 6 methods, including Bizum, Visa, Mastercard, PayPal, Paysafecard, Bitcoin.
How long do withdrawals take at Dafabet?
SlotAff has no moderated withdrawal reports for Dafabet yet. The operator's own payout claims are recorded during research but are never treated as evidence — a signed-in player can submit the first report.
How we check
Research method and coverage · last checked 18 October 2026Confirmed from a source4
- Licence status confirmed by Direccion General de Ordenacion del Juego
- Legal entity / ownership on file
- 6 payment methods documented
- Market availability researched for 1 market
Not established2
- No current offer researched
- No provider or platform data researched
A gap here is a gap in our research, not a finding about the operator. We publish a fact only when a source we can name supports it, and we say so plainly when one does not exist.