Licence record confirmed from the Spillemyndigheden register
Source: Official register
StatusActive
All casinos
What we researched
2 of 6 confirmed- LicenceConfirmed— confirmed
- Ownership1 entity on file— confirmed
- OffersNone researched— not established
- PaymentsNone documented— not established
- ProvidersNone researched— not established
- MarketsNot established— not established
Last checked 14 October 2026How we check
Licence
Licence register record · register import 3 September 2026Are you the operator? Correct or update this profile
Company & legal entities
Researched relationshipsCurrent operating entities1
| Entity | Role | Ownership |
|---|---|---|
| Denix Limited | Operating company | Ownership not established |
Market availability
Evidence per market · one row per marketNo market evidence researched yet for this operator.
Payments
Operator's own termsNo payment method research on file.
Offers
Operator's own termsNo current offer research on file.
Withdrawal
Two sources, never mergedWhat the operator publishes
Nothing published
What players reported
Not enough reports yet
No moderated player reports on file yet.
Report your withdrawalPlayer experience
Community, moderatedNo approved reviews yet
Used Casinomoto? Share how it actually went, reviews are opinion and never change a researched fact.
Common questions
Answered from held evidence onlyIs Casinomoto licensed?
Yes. Casinomoto holds an active Spillemyndigheden licence (reference Denix Limited), verified against the official register.
How long do withdrawals take at Casinomoto?
SlotAff has no moderated withdrawal reports for Casinomoto yet. The operator's own payout claims are recorded during research but are never treated as evidence — a signed-in player can submit the first report.
How we check
Research method and coverage · last checked 14 October 2026Confirmed from a source2
- Licence status confirmed by Spillemyndigheden
- Legal entity / ownership on file
Not established4
- No current offer researched
- No payment methods on file
- No provider or platform data researched
- No market availability confirmed
A gap here is a gap in our research, not a finding about the operator. We publish a fact only when a source we can name supports it, and we say so plainly when one does not exist.