Skip to content
All casinos

Betclic

betclic.pt

Servico de Regulacao e Inspecao de Jogos licence · activeOperated by BEM OPERATIONS LIMITEDSafety Index 9.8/10 (Very high) · Casino Guru

Run a quick check

What we researched

5 of 6 confirmed
Last checked 7 September 2026How we check

Licence

Licence register record · register import 3 September 2026

Are you the operator? Correct or update this profile

Company & legal entities

Researched relationships
Current operating entities1
EntityRoleOwnership
BEM OPERATIONS LIMITEDOperating companyOwnership not established

Market availability

Evidence per market · one row per market
MarketEvidenceRecords
PortugalSite listed by regulator1 record

Payments

Operator's own pages and curated review sources

Cards

Mastercard · Visa
MastercardDeposit
VisaDeposit

E-wallets

MB WAY · PayPal · Skrill
MB WAYDeposit
PayPalDeposit
SkrillDeposit

Bank and open banking

Bank Transfer
Bank TransferDeposit

Limits are set in the operator's cashier and are not published.

Offers1

Operator's own terms

Published bonus terms, read from the operator's own pages or, where the label says so, from curated review pages, and structured into comparable facts. A term that is not published is not shown.

Welcome offer

€40 free after €10 deposit

Wagering
25×
Code
OBS100

Evidence

Offer terms

Official terms ↗

Withdrawal

Two sources, never merged

What the operator publishes

Nothing published

What players reported

Not enough reports yet

No moderated player reports on file yet.

Report your withdrawal

Third-party reputation

Independent aggregators
  • casino_guruSafety Index9.8/10 (Very high)source · as of 3 September 2026
  • TrustpilotTrustScore1.2/5 (175 reviews, 93% 1-star)source · as of 3 September 2026

What players report

External Reputation Signal · Trustpilot / community

External review signal: high concernTrustpilot 1.4/5 (109 reviews) · Very poor player score — caution

Caution: Betclic Portugal scores 1.4 out of 5 on Trustpilot (109 reviews, 88% one-star). Despite being a licensed brand, the record shows accounts closed with pending funds unrefunded and rigged-feel games. Verify early, keep records of pending bets, withdraw promptly, and escalate an unresolved bet/withdrawal to the Portuguese regulator (SRIJ).

External reputation signal from third-party player reviews — not a SlotAff safety verdict, Trust score or licence assessment. Player claims are reports, not verified facts.

Common complaints

  • Accounts suspended/closed with poor explanation; pending bet funds not refunded
  • Rigged-feel casino games with low returns despite claimed high RTP
  • Unresponsive email support and copy-paste chat; slow withdrawals
  • 88% one-star; one €141.41 bet left unresolved

Fair points

  • Some successful withdrawals
  • Regulatory compliance cited in company responses

Sources: Trustpilot

Player experience

Community, moderated

No approved reviews yet

Used Betclic? Share how it actually went, reviews are opinion and never change a researched fact.

Write a review

Common questions

Answered from held evidence only
Is Betclic licensed?

Yes. Betclic holds an active Servico de Regulacao e Inspecao de Jogos licence (reference BEM OPERATIONS LIMITED), verified against the official register.

What payment methods does Betclic accept?

Research on the operator's own pages found at least 6 methods, including Visa, Mastercard, MB WAY, PayPal, Skrill, Bank Transfer.

Does Betclic have a welcome offer?

The most recent offer on file is "€40 free after €10 deposit". Terms are read from the operator's own offer page; always confirm them there before depositing.

How long do withdrawals take at Betclic?

SlotAff has no moderated withdrawal reports for Betclic yet. The operator's own payout claims are recorded during research but are never treated as evidence — a signed-in player can submit the first report.

How we check

Research method and coverage · last checked 7 September 2026

Confirmed from a source5

  • Licence status confirmed by Servico de Regulacao e Inspecao de Jogos
  • Legal entity / ownership on file
  • 1 offer researched from the operator's own pages and curated review sources
  • 6 payment methods documented
  • Market availability researched for 1 market

Not established1

  • No provider or platform data researched

A gap here is a gap in our research, not a finding about the operator. We publish a fact only when a source we can name supports it, and we say so plainly when one does not exist.